Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Tx101's avatar

Overall I've been wildly disappointed in Trumponomics 2.0 among many other things. Foreign policy being another big one. The only thing im completely satisfied with is the speed at which he secured the border.

In regards to trade, The only way 0 tariffs would make sense is if other countries or blocs agreed to do the same across the board to include vat and other barriers. That's what I thought his goal was going to be at first. Sadly I was wrong. Now it seems like he's committed to riding this thing straight off a cliff

0 barriers is the answer BUT any country that doesn't want to completely open their markets to the United States should be tariffed at at least an amount equal to their tariffs and non tariff trade barriers in my humble opinion. I think that's the middle ground that makes sense. That's how you protect our industries without penalizing them with insane tariff policy.

Agree overall with the firing the messenger sentiment. But I don't think it's a terrible idea overall to start fresh in regards to anyone that was involved with the Biden clown show so I can't say I'm totally upset about her being gone. I looked into her and shes definitely an ideologue.

Kathleen Hays's avatar

Thanks for this analysis. Interesting charts.

You want to replace BLS with ADP? Love their work, very useful supplement to BLS employment report. But don't agreee. Government could easily afford to update, beef up, and modernize the BLS. Elected officials don't want to be bothered.

1 more comment...

No posts

Ready for more?